Real Estate, Retirement and the IRA

Retirement Planning Meets Real Estate (And Really Hit it Off) You are never too young to start saving for retirement. On the other hand, only your specific life circumstances determine if you’re too old. Although earlier is best when it comes to retirement planning, later is still better than never. Whenever you choose to start, it is important to know your options and limitations.

It is difficult to find an employer that offers a consistent pension plan.  Those approaching retirement rely primarily on IRAs to assist in saving for retirement. However, most people never take control of their retirement accounts and passivity can be costly for your nest egg. The majority of IRA money in our country is invested in stocks, bonds and mutual funds. According to MSNMoney.com, about 97 percent of IRA money is dedicated to these traditional investments. That means only 3 percent of our IRA money is dedicated to alternative investments, such as real estate, that have the ability to produce higher returns.

The rules governing allowable investments by IRAs only exclude three classes of investments: collectibles (such as artwork, gems, antiques and most coins), life-insurance and S corporations. All other types of investments are permitted, which makes for seemingly endless investment options. One trend that is beginning to gain popularity is using IRA money to invest in real estate.

Investing in real estate through an IRA widens the range of alternative investments available for individuals planning their retirement. Introducing real estate into your retirement portfolio has obvious benefits. For one, it can act as a means to diversify your portfolio, which can help to hedge against the volatility in the stock market or government-backed investments. Also, for those who are experienced in real-estate investing, or those who seek help from a professional who is, real-estate investments have the potential to protect against principal loss. Real estate can also generate better-than-market-rate returns through income production and capital gains. With the help of a Registered Investment Advisor, your income and capital gains could also be stuffed back into your IRA either tax-deferred (as with a traditional IRA) or tax-free (as with a Roth IRA).

Arguably, the easiest way to incorporate real estate into your retirement plans is to have your IRA purchase the asset and you treat it strictly as an investment. This means you cannot use the property for personal reasons, which excludes the options of purchasing and frequenting a vacation home or purchasing property from relatives. There are no complex issues involved when you treat the asset only as an investment as long as your IRA pays cash for it. But, this is not a feasible option for everyone.

If you have to leverage a mortgage, things get a bit more complicated. For instance, you cannot personally guarantee a loan for your IRA. Also, your IRA will pay tax on something called Unrelated Debt Financed Income, which is the income that can be attributed to the leveraged portion of the loan. If you are not well-versed in real-estate investing, you can run into some major tax complications when trying to use your retirement accounts to purchase real estate. I highly recommend seeking the help of a professional for two specific reasons. First, a professional helps eliminate headaches and complexity. Second, he or she can help to ensure that your retirement account has the best chance to bloom and remain fruitful throughout your entire retirement.

To help simplify the complex process of introducing real-estate investments into your retirement plans, I have uploaded an e-book that you can download for free at www.ThePowellPerspective.com. Inside the “Real Estate Risk and Retirement Planning Pt. 1” e-book you will find:

– How to decide if real-estate investments are right for you right now

– Helpful guidance for introducing real-estate investments into your retirement plans

– How to navigate the different options you have when it comes to real-estate investing

– The importance of holding a diversified retirement portfolio

– How to use real-estate investments as a hedge against inflation 

I have compiled information from a variety of sources to create an e-book that can help readers take the unknown out of a complex topic. It is my hope with this two-part e-book, that readers will find the information they need to take control of their retirement planning and stop putting it off. Retirement can be filled with relaxation, travel and free time to complete a number of your life goals. There is no reason to be worried about your finances later on in life when you can easily take the right steps toward financial security today.

All My Best,

Thomas J. Powell

For the free eBook, please visit www.ThePowellPerspective.com 

Rebuilding Your Wealth with Real Estate

              As our economy slowly recovers, many investors are concerned with recouping the money they lost during the crisis. Pulling your funds out of investments all together will do nothing to bulk up your savings, while sinking your money into risky funds can do further damage. So, with black-and-white options not offering solutions, where can investors put their money to work?

Many investors are turning to investments that they feel are safe, such as bank CDs or money market mutual funds. The problem with these “safe havens” lies in the low returns. “The average money market fund yields .05 percent, or $5 on a $10,000 deposit.” With rates of return this low, these investments may not be able to keep up with inflation, let alone fill the gaps left by the losses experienced over the last 24 months.

Another option is to do nothing. Yvon Chouinard, founder of the Patagonia sports outlets, says, “There’s no difference between a pessimist who says, ‘Oh it’s hopeless, so don’t bother doing anything’ and an optimist who says, ‘Don’t bother doing anything, it’s going to turn out fine anyway.’ Either way, nothing happens.” The idea of holding on to your portfolio “as is” and wishing for the stocks you currently hold to rebound may work in some instances. But, if time turns out to be your enemy, your retirement years will be funded only by the amount you currently have, minus the effects of inflation.

As investors actively search for ways to re-energize their portfolios, many are returning to real estate. The real estate market is hovering around the bottom, interest rates remain near record lows and a large inventory gives buyers an abundance of options. On the residential side, many foreclosures and bank-owned properties can now be purchased for a fraction of their value. The same opportunities are becoming available in commercial real estate as owners are unable to pay off or refinance their loans.

As I have mentioned before, real estate can help your portfolio win the battle over inflation. Real estate’s value will return at some point.

Shaking Our Stone Age Tendencies  

Letting our emotions dictate our investment decisions is a risky behavior. Out of instinct, we all get emotional when we earn or lose money. It is in our wiring to feel connected with the money we have accumulated. We tend to panic when our money is in jeopardy.

We make a connection between money and safety. Psychology suggests that we are programmed to protect our safety the same way our ancient ancestors were. Even though we encounter vastly different problems than our ancestors did, we still attempt to solve them in the same way. Moving with the herd used to be crucial to staying alive. Today however, moving with a herd of investors can weaken your portfolio. Pushing money into an investment simply because the majority of others are is usually the exact opposite of what you should be doing.

In the same vein as the herd behavior, is our tendency to make investment decisions based on past success. Just because a strategy worked in the past does not necessarily mean it will work in the present. Markets change dramatically from week to week. Strategies you used in the Dotcom boom of the late nineties may lead to an unpleasant outcome in today’s market. Sticking to market fundamentals is one thing, but taking on blind risk a second time because it worked out the first, is nothing more than a gamble. It is the same concept behind betting on red because the roulette ball fell in a red pocket the previous spin. No matter what your past performance, prudent due diligence is always necessary to gauge the current market trends, analyze risk and make sound investment decisions.

I have encountered a number of studies that suggest we remember the bitter feeling of losing money more acutely than the feelings we have when we earn the same amount in an investment. A few lousy investment decisions and an investor can be turned off indefinitely. It is important to learn from our mistakes and use the knowledge to our advantage. Our emotions can lead us to make decisions that, in hindsight, are horrible ideas. A bad decision is bad no matter what the outcome. Making money out of an emotional decision is lucky, but the decision itself was still the wrong one.

There is no way to completely escape our tendencies to invest based on emotion. But, by being aware of the negative impact our emotions have on our investment decisions, we can limit their influence. Wise approaches such as hiring investment professionals, practicing prudent due diligence and planning sound exit strategies can all help us become better investors. 

Bank Closures v. the FDIC 

Last week, federal regulators seized seven more banks- three in Florida and one each in Georgia, Minnesota, Illinois and Wisconsin. The bank failures brought the year’s total to 106, which is the most since the savings and loan debacle brought about 181 failures in 1992.  Plus, with 416 banks on the FDIC’s watch list, the number of bank failures is expected to rise before the end of the year. With bank closures quickly absorbing millions of dollars from the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund, is it possible that our savings accounts are realistically still protected?

The FDIC operates like a basic insurance policy, except banks are the customers instead of individuals or groups of individuals. Banks pay insurance premiums to the FDIC in exchange for its commitment to protect their depositors’ money. In the late 1920s, when banks closed at an alarming rate, depositors had no protection from bank failures. Between 1929 and 1933, banks lost an estimated $1.3 billion of their customers’ money. Today, the FDIC protects several trillion dollars worth of deposits. But as of June, it only had $10.4 billion in its deposit insurance fund—down from about $45 billion earlier this year.

The FDIC’s reserves have quickly depleted as the cost of bank failures outpace the fees the corporation collects. Last month, as bank closures continued to mount, the FDIC’s board of directors considered four ways to bulk up the insurance fund. The options considered were: borrow from healthy banks, borrow from the treasury, levy a special fee on banks or collect regular premiums early.

Borrowing from healthy banks would reduce the amount of money available to the private sector. Borrowing from the Treasury could send the wrong message to the public and have adverse effects on the banking industry. Levying a special fee on banks could push those on the edge into failure. The last option, albeit not particularly attractive either, is to collect regular premiums early. Deciding to follow through with this option, the FDIC stated it “adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would require insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012.” The press release indicated that the FDIC estimates prepayments will total approximately $45 billion.

Once approved, the proposed prepayments could give banks a bill for three years of premiums by the end of this year. While the requirement would put banks in a tough situation, the FDIC does not seem to think banks will find it too cumbersome. The FDIC believes that “the banking industry has substantial liquidity to prepay assessments.” As stated in the press release, “As of June 30, FDIC-insured institutions held more than $1.3 trillion in liquid balances, or 22 percent more than they did a year ago.”

The FDIC does have the capability to protect our deposits. However, initiatives that charge banks three years’ worth of premiums at once could help the FDIC weather an onslaught of bank closures without requiring the government to print more money…I hope.

All My Best,

Thomas J. Powell 

Isn’t It Ironic? Bailed-Out Banks Pulling in Huge Profits While Business Struggles

It has been very interesting the past several days in the stock market.  The Dow pushed over 10,000 last week and sits at nearly 10,100 today.  The weak dollar can share part of the claim reaching this important mark, but another, more interesting part are the reports by some of the country’s largest banks of very solid earnings for the past quarter.

JPMorgan reported a profit between July and September of $3.59 billion.  Goldman Sachs earned $3.19 billion during the same time period, reporting the most it has ever made in three months, with each of the bank’s employees earning an average of $700,000 EACH.  Citigroup has reported a profit of $101 million; we’ve gotten so used to the “B” word, millions seem like chump change.

I am happy to know that some companies out there are actually making a profit and helping to create some positive news out there in the market place.  However, it strikes me as completely ironic that most of these institutions are the same organizations which 1) Helped create the economic mess in which we find ourselves; 2) Were bailed out by the taxpayers, meaning the 51% and mainly the top 5% of our population which pay the majority of taxes; and 3)Have stopped the flow of capital into the market, cutting off businesses from their credit and capital lifelines, all the while paying their people unbelievable amounts of money.

Don’t get me wrong.  I am all about capitalism, free enterprise and  entrepreneurship.  Those who make it on their own and with their own drive and tenacity deserve every dollar and every success they can collect.  What I am absolutely opposed to is the organization which has an open check and safety net from the government, hoards its money by investing in T-bills, stops the flow of capital and the monetary cycle to the market, all the while rewarding itself in the process.

No matter what positive signs the media is portraying, the every day reality is that business is hurting.  My circle of friends consists of nearly all business owners; not one of them I know is looking to hire anyone soon, and may still have more downsizing to go.  Nearly all of them need capital, and nearly all of them cannot find it, leaving them with dwindling options to keep their doors open.

I look forward to the flow of capital back into the market.  Until then, it’s going to be up to us as individuals to keep projects and businesses moving forward.  If you see a project or have a business you like, consider investing in those entities in addition to traditional investments.  I can assure you the gratitude from the business or project owner will far surpass that of a stock certificate, not to mention the potential returns may be very rewarding.

All my best,

Thomas J Powell

 

On Fox Business News Again

Explaining Derivatives to Michael Moore

            Documentarian Michael Moore’s latest project, Capitalism: A Love Story aimed at highlighting a number of flaws concerning the economic system upon which our country is built. In his film, Moore infiltrates Wall Street and Washington D.C. to “explore the root causes of the global economic meltdown.” In one scene, he attempts to make a citizens arrest of the AIG board of directors. In another, he drives an armored car to Merrill Lynch and attempts, kind of, to collect $10 billion on behalf of the American people. While searching for answers in high-profile places, Moore asks financial professionals to explain complex terms, such as derivatives. In an attempt to provide this answer for Mr. Moore, I thought I would revisit a scenario I created last year. The following is a fictional example. It never happened, except for in my head.

            There is and always has been stiff competition between Las Vegas casinos. Located miles from the strip, Sin and Tonic Casino relies on clever ideas from their owner, Dale, to increase profits. In the summer of 2005, Dale decided to unveil a ‘Play Now, Pay Later’ program to his loyal customers. Dale’s customers, most of whom rarely left the casino because they had no home or job to maintain, were allowed to gamble and drink while management kept tabs on how much money they were each blowing through.

            The customers told all of their friends down by the river about Sin and Tonic’s new program and soon the casino was always filled to record numbers for the property.

            Dale decided to lower the payouts on all of his table games and slot machines and also increase the price of alcoholic beverages. But, because his customers were not required to pay right away, no one seemed to complain. Dale’s sales blew through the roof and caught the attention of local banks. One bank referred to Dale’s customers’ debts as “valuable” and offered to increase Dale’s borrowing limit.

            With Dale’s customers’ debts as collateral, the bank turned the debts into securities known as Sin-a-Bonds. Soon, the Sin-a-Bonds were being traded on security markets nationwide. Investors across the country, and soon across the entire world, never knew the AAA-rated Sin-a-Bonds were, in reality, the debts of homeless gambling addicts.

            Leading brokerage firms were selling loads of Sin-a-Bonds and their prices continued to escalate at a surprising rate. Everything was fine until pesky risk managers started poking around and demanding the gamblers to start making payments on their debts. On a busy Saturday night at Sin and Tonic, Dale informed his customers that payments needed to start being made that Monday. The remainder of Saturday night and all day Sunday, Sin and Tonic was filled to capacity.
            On Monday morning Dale and his employees were witness to the first day without customers in the casino’s history. Not one of the customers came in to make payments on their debts and the ones that stumbled around drunk in the parking lot claimed they “hadn’t got no money.” Dale told the bank he could not pay back any of the money they lent him and he quickly decided to claim bankruptcy.

            Sin-a-bonds dropped to near-worthless levels and investors lost their money. Plus, the bank that issued the Sin-a-Bonds saw its capital depleted and they were consequently unable to offer any more loans. The bank laid off all of its employees and closed.

            Dale was unable to pay any of his bills and all the companies that granted him payment extensions had to take massive losses, as Dale was their largest customer. The carpet cleaning service was forced to downsize, the vending companies were left with handfuls of damaged machines that no one else was interested in and alcohol suppliers were left with large inventories that could not possibly be consumed without Dale’s heavy-drinking clientele.

            The brokerage firms that sold the Sin-a-Bonds were in heavy distress. Eventually, the government stepped in to save them by creating a bailout package that was funded by taxpayers from states where gambling is prohibited.

            Dale retired from the casino business and is now rumored to be heavily involved in politics.

 

Absolute Returns Absolutely

            An increasing number of investment firms looking to capitalize on the fears of their investors have started offering “absolute return” funds that boast the ability to always produce returns. Investment advisors are pushing mutual funds that are designed to produce positive returns no matter how badly the stock market is performing. The idea has been around for decades, but now major financial companies such as Goldman Sachs, Dreyfus and Putnam have all launched similar absolute-return funds.  In response to the growing group of clients who want to be able to rely on their portfolio’s positive performance, investment firms have started heavily marketing absolute-return funds. But, are these funds worth all the hype?

            Similar to hedge funds, absolute-return funds focus on making money in all market conditions. By taking long positions in stocks and balancing them with short positions of similar value and in similar assets, absolute-return funds aim to produce returns slightly higher than Treasury bills.  In a dropping market, gains on the short positions are meant to offset losses on the long positions. In a rising market, the long positions are supposed to outperform the shorts; therefore producing modest returns for passive investors. If the sheer makeup of an absolute-return fund is not producing, fund managers also attempt to achieve their target by employing a number of different strategies. For instance, short-selling can help offset market falls and derivatives can shield from undesired volatility.  

            Generally, the techniques used by absolute-return fund managers to stabilize your portfolio’s ride are the sort of diversification practices you can do yourself, without having to pay hefty annual fees. In a recent Reno Gazette Journal article, Registered Investment Adviser Robert Barone recommended the following three steps in order to achieve consistent positive returns:

            First, reduce the allocation to equities in your portfolio to the 30-to-40 percent range. Remember to hold equity positions in companies with sound business practices and low levels of debt.

            Second, increase the allocation to fixed income to the 40-to-50 percent range, but keep the maturities relatively short (no more than three or four years to maturity).

            Third, because of weak dollar policies, increase the normal allocation to commodities to the 10-to-20 percent range.

            The discussion of investment strategies in this article should not be considered an offer to buy or sell any investment. As always, consult an investment professional to assist you in meeting your investment goals.

 

A Broken CIT Will Trip up Small Businesses

            On October 1^st CIT announced the launch of a plan which will aim to enhance its capital and improve its liquidity. According to the official press release, the restructuring plan is designed to “ensure continued financing support for small business and middle market clients.” After being denied financial support from the Treasury in July, CIT was forced to create a restructuring plan in order to attempt to sidestep bankruptcy court. But, because of concerns with CIT’s financial stability, the FDIC has forbidden the company from increasing its deposits, which severely limits the restructuring tools in its belt.

            The target of the restructuring plan is to slice CIT’s $31 billion dollar debt load down to about $25 billion. But, some experts have argued that the amount is not nearly enough to persuade the FDIC to again allow CIT to accept deposits. CIT is offering voluntary exchange offers for certain unsecured notes. Current holders of an “existing debt security would receive a pro rata portion of each of five series of newly issued secured notes, with maturities ranging from four to eight years, and/or shares of newly issued voting preferred stock.”

            The future success of CIT relies on a significant increase in capital. The restrictions imposed by regulators and the troubling credit freeze have created enormous obstacles for CIT. Financial companies, like CIT, without direct access to Federal Reserve emergency loans rely on funding from short-term debt markets. But, with these markets already shriveled, the possibility of finding new debt buyers has all but disappeared.

            With CIT operating in more than 50 countries, it is peculiar that the government did not deem CIT “too big too fail,” as it has a number of other institutions. The last company of this size that was denied a bailout was Lehman Brothers and its resulting bankruptcy filing tore the financial market to ribbons.

            For over a century CIT has been a huge player in providing loans to small and medium-sized businesses. The company has more than one million corporate borrowers; including popular businesses such as Dunkin’ Donuts and Dillards. If (or when) CIT collapses, the biggest problem will be the scores of small businesses that will find it even more difficult to find capital to fuel their ventures. As constantly noted, small businesses are crucial to our recovery. The credit freeze has already built a wall between businesses and available capital. The crumbling of CIT will only exacerbate the problem and highlight the importance of private capital in the marketplace. Without capital, our financial system cannot begin to encourage economic growth, and without growth a recovery is out of reach.

All My Best,

Thomas J. Powell

 

 

 

---

 

Michael Moore: Here is a Derivative Explanation for You

In his new movie Capitalism: A Love Story, Michael Moore searches for someone to explain derivatives to him.  Michael, here is an easy explanation for you.  If you need me to explain it further, I would be happy to do so. 

All my best, 

Thomas J. Powell

How Derivatives Helped Collapse the Economy

The following is a fictional example. It never happened, except for in my head.

June, 2006

Las Vegas, Nev. 

There is and always has been stiff competition between Las Vegas casinos. Located miles from the strip, Sin and Tonic Casino relies on clever ideas from their owner, Dale, to increase profits. In the summer of 2005, Dale decided to unveil a ‘Play Now, Pay Later’ program to his loyal customers. Dale’s customers, most of whom rarely left the casino because they had no home or job to maintain, were allowed to gamble and drink while management kept tabs on how much money they were each blowing through.

The customers told all of their friends down by the river about Sin and Tonic’s new program and soon the casino was always filled to record numbers for the property.

Dale decided to lower the payouts on all of his table games and slot machines and also increase the price of alcoholic beverages. But, because his customers were not required to pay right away, no one seemed to complain. Dale’s sales blew through the roof and caught the attention of local banks. One bank referred to Dale’s customers’ debts as “valuable” and offered to increase Dale’s borrowing limit.

With Dale’s customers’ debts as collateral, the bank turned the debts into securities known as Sin-a-Bonds. Soon, the Sin-a-Bonds were being traded on security markets nationwide. Investors across the country, and soon across the entire world, never knew the AAA-rated Sin-a-Bonds were, in reality, the debts of homeless gambling addicts.

Leading brokerage firms were selling loads of Sin-a-Bonds and their prices continued to escalate at a surprising rate. Everything was fine until pesky risk managers started poking around and demanding the gamblers to start making payments on their debts. On a busy Saturday night at Sin and Tonic, Dale informed his customers that payments needed to start being made that Monday. The remainder of Saturday night and all day Sunday, Sin and Tonic was filled to capacity.

On Monday morning Dale and his employees were witness to the first day without customers in the casino’s history. Not one of the customers came in to make payments on their debts and the ones that stumbled around drunk in the parking lot claimed they “hadn’t got no money.” Dale told the bank he could not pay back any of the money they lent him and he quickly decided to claim bankruptcy.

 

 

Sin-a-bonds dropped to near-worthless levels and investors lost their money. Plus, the bank that issued the Sin-a-Bonds saw its capital depleted and they were consequently unable to offer any more loans. The bank laid off all of their employees and closed.

Dale was unable to pay any of his bills and all the companies that granted him payment extensions had to take massive loses, as Dale was their largest customer. The carpet cleaning service was forced to downsize, the vending companies were left with handfuls of damaged machines that no one else was interested in and alcohol suppliers were left with large inventories that could not possibly be consumed without Dale’s heavy-drinking clientele.

The brokerage firms that sold the Sin-a-Bonds were in heavy distress. Eventually, the government stepped in to save them by creating a bailout package that was funded by tax payers from states where gambling is prohibited.

Dale retired from the casino business and is now rumored to be heavily involved in politics.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dollar Distress

This bogus Robert Fisk story is getting a lot of play today.  He claims that the Saudis, Russians and Chinese are holding “secret” meetings to price oil in something other than the dollar.   If they exist, the meetings represent a shift away from a US dominated world economy.  This has been the case since at least 1989, but the idea never fails to stir conspiracy theory. 

Quacks harbor a particular fear of China since it holds over $2 trillion in US debt.  China has long threatened to assert its growing economic muscle by abandoning the dollar altogether.  A few years ago, China switched from a currency pegged to the dollar, to one that floated against a basket of currencies.   A recent China Daily article reflects many misconceptions.  For one, they claim that the fate of the dollar is intrinsically tied to comments made by Chinese officials.  Second, it reiterates China’s call for a new reserve currency.  These policy changes and statements are just political. They only fuel conspirators misunderstanding of international monetary policy.

The truth is, as Epstein points out, China’s fate is tied to our economic policy-not the other way around.   Last year, despite financial crisis, China increased its holdings of US debt. It takes a lot more than a few meetings, secret or not, to create a new reserve system. 

Doomsday types proclaim the end of US hegemony and the fall of the empire through a weak dollar.  Again, bogus.   A weak dollar can be good for an economy.  It boosts exports, decreases costs for debtors and gives investors holding foreign investments higher yields. Most big US companies have international holdings, so they are immune to small fluctuations.  A slight devaluation can stimulate an economy. Also, this is the US, so a depreciating currency will not cause capital flight as it did in Thailand ten years ago.

One more thing about the quacks: how would a single global currency eliminate current account imbalances, inflation, risk and instability?  It makes no sense.  We still have all of these things within monetary unions. If you look at Poland or the UK, you can find both benefits and costs to joining a large monetary union.  In order for any monetary union to work, it musk have flexible financial and labor markets with a shared governing body.  An integrated global union would concentrate power even further, not democratize the global economy. 

As for the Fisk story, it doesn’t matter what we price oil in.  The Saudi’s are not actually carrying around bags dollars- oil transactions are electronic and denominated in whatever currency you like-dollars, euros or Cuban cigars. 

 

Celebrating the Life of Don Fisher, Gap Founder and BGCA Governor

A good friend to Boys and Girls Clubs of America, Don Fisher, passed away on Sunday. Don and his wife Doris have been making an impact on the kids of the United States, and the world, for more than 50 years.

For me personally as a Club Kid in the 70’s, I am very grateful that Don chose to support BGCA along many other great causes. I believe that it is more important than ever during these challenging times to invest in what works – and BGCA is doing great work throughout our country. Our Clubs are currently making an impact on over 4 million kids this year and we have more than 30 MILLION Alumni touching every corner of our planet.

If you are looking to make a small, or large, investment in something that is a proven solution, perhaps I can challenge you to join Tonya and me in giving to BGCA through our web page at http://www.supportbgca.com. The site allows you to make a gift online and only takes a minute of your time.

Private Capital + Private Enterprise = Economic Recovery, and our individual support of BGCA is a great part of this equation. I thank you for your consideration and hope you will take a moment to learn about the good work the Fishers have done over their lifetimes.

All my best,

Tom

 

The Recession is Very Likely Over? Don’t Bet on it!

As I posted yesterday, Bernanke was quoted as saying the current recession is most likely over. Cheers may have been heard around the dinner table and throughout the board rooms and trading rooms around the country.

But wait, not so fast. Understand what it means when Bernanke says the Recession is most likely over. What he is telling all of us is that the FALL is most likely over. Take for example the stock market. At its highest point, the market reached 14164; 6547 has been its low. Today we are sitting at 9791 as I write this post, which is just under a 50% gain from its low point. This is one of the numbers that has everyone cheering, correct?

Remember, at 9791 we are STILL nearly 50% UNDER the high of the market from the low point. This means we have a long way to go before getting back to EVEN. We can applaud our progress and slap ourselves on the back, but true growth is most likely going to be a slow climb back up the mountain.

I saw numbers that show a 2.7% gain in retail sales for August, along with applause for the largest growth in three years. Are you sitting out there like I am wondering how foolish the government thinks we are, knowing those numbers are almost certainly the result of the Cash for Clunkers program? I am very curious to see the “miraculous” September numbers, as I shockingly think they may go back to a flatline position without the assistance of $3 Billion in government aid.

As much as I am crossing my fingers that this Recession is in the record books and we can stick a fork in it, I wouldn’t bet on it. Especially for those of us in small business, the entrepreneurs and the foundation of our country’s work environment. Until capital is made available again in the market, business will continue to suffer, unemployment will continue to stalk us, and no true recovery will be made. That you can bet on.

I look forward to hearing your feedback.

All my best,

Thomas J Powell

Thomas J. Powell – Reasonable Regulation: That’s Allstate’s Stand

Reasonable Regulation: That’s Allstate’s Stand

            Many companies involved in financial services cower when an official of any stature mentions the threat of national regulation, but Allstate has decided to embrace it. Since late April, Allstate has been pushing an advertising campaign that is rooted in support for creating a national regulation agency for all players in the financial industry, including insurance companies. Each ad in the four-part series, which runs in major magazines such as The Atlantic, touts the common theme of calling on “Congress to act boldly and quickly in drafting strong, comprehensive and clear federal regulation.”[1]

             Under the current system, insurance companies are regulated on a state-by-state basis, something that Allstate CEO Tom Wilson thinks needs be changed. In a national press release, Wilson argued:

 The American consumer is burdened with a patchwork of insurance regulatory systems that are cumbersome and ineffective in managing risks in an era of rapid change and innovation. American families need better protection from systemic risks and access to products and services that will help better manage their financial futures.[2]

 

            Allstate’s push for a national regulation system is bold. The campaign appears to be having an impact as the Obama administration has started tackling a number of vital decisions that could ultimately lead to national regulation for all financial services. President Obama himself may not have been directly affected by Allstate’s campaign, but according to PRnewswire.com at least one Congressperson has received more than $20,000 in campaign contributions from Allstate over the past four years. Clearly Allstate has identified the potential benefits that would come bundled with national regulation.

            One group that stands to be trapped and bound by the regulatory net of a national system is the stock brokers on Wall Street. The Obama administration has proposed a plan that would hold brokers to the stricter fiduciary standards of registered investment advisors. Under this plan, brokers would be required by law to act in their clients’ best interests, not their own. Also, with each piece of investment advice, brokers would be obligated to disclose what they stand to gain personally. A plan to implement a complete regulation overhaul is sure to be cumbersome and will take time to be implemented effectively. The Obama administration would be wise to have patience with this reform and comb through all of the complexities before attempting to have anything signed into law.

 At the end of the day, the federal regulatory overhaul will aim to force those in the financial system to be more transparent, something the Allstate campaign clearly addresses: “Only when there is transparency around valuing the risk in the financial system—including the role of insurance to help mitigate that risk—will we regain confidence in the economy.”[3]           

To view all of the Allstate advertisements in their entirety, visit allstate.com/fedreg.

 

 

Commercial Real Estate’s Role in the Next Bailout

            Banks have had little to celebrate over the past 20 plus months. Still dizzy from the debacle caused by residential real estate, banks nationwide fear the devastation that could soon be unleashed by the rising number of foreclosures in commercial real estate.

            The banks which provided the money to build endless numbers of commercial buildings originally did so because they, like so many others, believed occupancy and rent rates would always consistently rise. But, many owners of commercial buildings are now fueling another wave of foreclosures because they are not able to generate enough cash from tenants to cover their principal and interest payments. Because the loans have also been bundled and sold on Wall Street as commercial-backed mortgage securities (CMBS), the foreclosed buildings spark a ripple effect. Anticipating the severe consequences this could have on our economy, the Federal Reserve is struggling to contain the situation and prevent the need for a second wave of bank bailouts.

            According to Deutsche Bank, about $153 billion in loans that make up CMBS will come due by the end of 2012. The vast majority of these will not be eligible for refinancing through their lenders because the values of the properties have dropped so dramatically.[4] The losses will potentially cripple not only the owners of the commercial properties, but also anyone holding CMBS. Furthermore, because CMBS typically help drive pension and hedge funds, the pain will be widely spread.

            The only positive side of this mess will be the number of affordable investment opportunities for those looking to get into commercial real estate. Commercial real estate does perform in the long haul. But, because of the onslaught of new commercial buildings that sprouted in recent years, we are now experiencing an uncomfortable rebalancing of the industry. Loans that were made on loose credit and then bundled by Wall Street into dicey investment vehicles are all being exposed. However, the underlying properties are not rotten; they still make for sound investments.

            Like the residential market, the commercial real-estate industry was saturated with quick deals that turned sour because they were not thought through. Now, because the consequences stretched so far, the commercial real-estate industry has to be turned upside down and untangled. Although the untangling process will be turbulent, it will also be exposing an array of investment possibilities. Commercial real estate provides the venues for consumer spending. As the economy slowly recovers, so too will the demand for prime commercial real estate—something that will be readily available and reasonably priced in the immediate future.  

 

Keep Health Care in Our “Best Interest”

            I have been reluctant to bring the argument of national health-care reform to the Powell Perspective because it does not necessarily pertain to real estate, finance or investing. But, national health-care reform has the potential to have drastic impact on our economy, and for this reason I believe it deserves attention here.

            I have been convinced to raise this issue after overhearing a 20-something at the gas pump discuss the issue with someone of similar age. “Man, the whole thing is no big deal, I mean how often do we really go to the doctor anyway?” he said. As I drove off, I realized that the young man, healthy and probably feeling somewhat resilient, was simply not interested in the topic. He wanted to be able to disregard the topic so he could have more attention to focus on the issues that had a more immediate impact on him.

            This week will bring an important turn in the debate over national health-care reform. The Obama administration has committed itself to rethinking the plan before the President is scheduled to address Congress on September 9^th. President Obama is now going to be leading the arguments that he has been able to mostly sidestep thus far. What has me concerned is that the administration will recognize what I did while pumping my gas: The youth do not care. If the Obama administration addresses this and rebrands the issue to somehow get the youth behind it, then the approval rating for health-care reform could skyrocket. The same demographic that helped the President win the office, could now help direct a national issue that they may not be truly interested in for another 20 years. On the other hand, maybe it is time to address the demographic who will still be paying for this change long after we are gone. After all, the people that currently have a vested interest are at a standstill after becoming equally heated on both sides of the issue.

            Since its appearance in the Obama administration’s limelight, health-care reform has done nothing but become more complex. The plan is unclear. No one knows what it will look like, we only know what the media reports: We’re currently 37^th in the world in health-care quality. Death panels will dictate how long we live. The President will personally pull the plug on our grandma. If there are details to this administration’s plan, then they have all been shadowed by heated talk show hosts’ attempts to get the public screaming about something no one knows about.

            On September 9^th President Obama is going to be forced to add some structure to his administration’s plan. Thus far, no one has been able to dissect and discredit the plan because it has only taken shape through various town hall meetings and informal gatherings. In his first address to Congress since February, President Obama will be talking exclusively about health care. This national issue is going to take rigid leadership from the President. If he wants to make any progress he is going to have to involve the nation by getting the young to care and the old to stop shouting at one another and listen.

           

 

 

---

[1] See http://www.allstate.com/about/advoc-insurance-fed-charter.aspx

[2] See http://allstate.com/content/refresh-attachments/Advoc_FedCharter.pdf

[3] See http://www.allstate.com/content/refresh-attachments/FedREg_Pool.pdf

[4] See http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125167422962070925.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us