Stimulus, Growth and Recovery: The Debate Continues

There is growing intelligent dissent to the administration’s stimulus policy.  Critics argue that recent growth is the result of market principles.  Edward P. Lazear wrote Monday in the WSJ, that he forecasted a return to growth without stimulus spending.  He goes on to argue, along with others, that  housing programs have had questionable results.  Lazear said that Uncle Sam is fibbing about job growth as well, reporting job retention as if it where job creation.  John Irons of the Economic Policy Institute agrees.  The administration has an incentive to report positive unemployment numbers- the most popular, but also misunderstood indicator.

Unemployment is only part of the overall picture.  Other improving indicators reported this week tell us that the economy is turning around-but for whom? It depends on how you define growth.  A technical definition says that growth is positive GDP.  That means little to most people.  Real growth, theoretically, is an improvement in living standards for the entire country.  That’s why Main Street understands the unemployment rate.  Accordingly, the media use it as the sole judge for growth.  The problem is, as Lazear mentioned,  job growth is the final component of recovery- behind financial stability and GDP growth.  Unemployment lags years behind an actual recovery.   If unemployment is a lagging indicator, Lazear cannot empirically link failed stimulus policy to persistent unemployment.  He says that the administration is ignoring job losses while inflating job creation numbers.  Isn’t he doing the same thing by ignoring market stabilization and GDP growth? 

BEA Released GDP Data This Week 

According to the BEA, GDP is up for a number of reasons.  Look closely at the report.  Exports rose 14 percent over last quarter and consumer spending rose 3.4 percent.  Market Watch reported that positive numbers where in part due to stimulus spending, but as I argued in the past, these gains are only temporary.  The purpose of the stimulus is to stabilize the economy so that private markets can function again.  There is no wider conspiracy.  The government will roll back stimulus as soon as it sees the return of private investment.  There is evidence of this already: government spending actually slowed by 3.5 percent.

Not all the news was good.  Personal income fell and prices rose.  Hopefully this is a temporary trend based on slight price increases and high unemployment.  However, as long as export growth remains positive, I see no need to fear 70s style stagflation.  

Savings and Long-Term Growth

According to the old Solow Model, a country’s savings rate is positively related to long-term growth.  Today, personal savings is around five percent, that’s up from around one percent just four years ago.  This bodes well for long-term growth in the US.  And now is a great time to invest.  As private investment (including people’s savings) replaces public spending in the next few years, markets will rebound.  Private investment will power an upswing in the business cycle, spark growth and reduce unemployment. The sooner the government rolls back stimulus, the better.  In the mean time, citizens can take advantage of great opportunities in real estate and other deflated markets.  This transfer of savings from a stock to a flow will jump-start the economy in way no stimulus could.  It would take tens of trillions of dollars in government spending to match the power of private investors.

Thomas J. Powell

Take Advantage of the Future by Investing Now

              Investors at all levels have been tempted to stash their savings away in what they view as safe places: federally-insured banks, gold, their mattresses. But, as retirement creeps closer, or for some of you, continues on, it is difficult to protect the value of what you have. It is even more difficult to take what you have and get it to work for you. However, difficult does not mean impossible. There are tremendous opportunities in this economic climate and these opportunities can do wonders for your future.

              There is no direct financial path to retirement safety, but putting some basic concepts to work can give your investment portfolio a boost and start you in the right direction. A 60-year-old investor needs to plan for at least 30 years of financial security, so investing in the short-term is not sufficient. Planning for the long-term comes with one major obstacle: inflation. Shoving your cash into a large, everything-proof safe will ensure that the cash is always available, but inflation is resistant to safes and will still eat away at your value. Inflation adds to the puzzle of retirement planning, but keeping a stash of conservative investments can help save your portfolio from being deteriorated by inflation.

              Investors do not have to fear that most conservative money-market funds or bonds issued by the federal government will lose their money. But, these are short-term protection strategies. The returns offered by these investments are likely not enough to stave off inflation. If the cost of living significantly rises, you are going to want your savings to do the same. Many investors are turning to TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) for peace of mind. TIPS can be very helpful in side stepping inflation woes, but in a low-inflation environment, your returns will be lower than many other fixed-income securities. So, do not go overboard with TIPS.

              Your best weapon is diversification. Having a diverse mix of investments is a great strategy for both conservative and more risk-adverse investors. Diversification will always be your best hedge against inflation. Setting up a brief meeting with a registered investment adviser will help you to build a diverse portfolio that meets your needs. Playing it too safe now is not something you want to try and correct years after retirement. Running out of money later in life is something you can, and should, protect against now. And, again, this economic climate is filled with long-term investment opportunities. 

Living Vicariously Through Predictions

              Despite grim news reported for September that housing starts came in lower than expected, they rose from August rates. The tendency to be disappointed when expectations are not fulfilled adds to the bad news already being forced on us during these difficult times. When a report from the Commerce Department was released in Washington earlier this week, newspapers jumped at the chance to report that the glass was half empty. All predictions aside, housing starts still showed improvement.

              According to The Wall Street Journal, “The rise in housing starts came in at 0.5 percent, climbing to a seasonally adjusted 590,000 annual rate compared to the prior month.”[1]  Housing starts improved, but major media outlets pumped out headlines such as “Bummer for Housing Starts” (Forbes) and “Housing Starts Miss Expectations” (CNNMoney.com). The media ignored projections made by 76 economists in a Bloomberg survey. Their estimates predicted that housing starts would rise somewhere between a rate of 582,000 to 630,000. But, their estimates were made at a time when the August rate was thought to be 598,000. When a correction to the August figures brought the number down to 587,000, the predictions had already been made. If the numbers the economists were using were off by 11,000, then you could assume most of them would have lowered their expectations by the same amount. This would have made the average of the 76 predictions stand at 595,000; which is very close to the recently reported 590,000 figure.

              The point of all of this is that our economy still showed a humble sign of improvement. With the amount of slack still present in the housing industry, it is a small feat to break ground on any amount of new homes. Looking through rose-colored lenses will not do us any good, we need to be realistic. In that same vein, hammering out pessimistic stories when they are not realistic will only bring down the confidence upon which our markets rely. A group of surveyed economists who were making predictions based on false numbers should not have a drastic impact on our economic situation. As Charles Mackay wrote in his well-noted “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds” in 1841: “Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.”

              Negativity spreads quickly. We have enough to go mad over without becoming disappointed when a group of “experts” do not have their predictions come true. I think the real worry here should be in our experts’ ability to make accurate predictions. Instead of “Bummer for Housing Starts” how about “Experts off Again” or “The Facts the Experts Couldn’t See Coming”?  

Oh! I Didn’t See You There, Small Businesses

              Small-business advocates have criticized the White House for not giving more attention to small businesses. But, on Wednesday the Obama Administration announced that it would use funds leftover from the $700 billion bailout package to aid small businesses. Discussion of the new program came in response to dissatisfaction with the initial wave of bailouts that aimed at helping large financial firms and neglected small businesses. Many policy makers have argued for months that the $700 billion stimulus was only used to balance the books of large banks.

              The new plan, which is still nameless, will aim to increase lending at small, community-based banks. As was the case when individual states were dealt federal funds, the banks will be required to submit somewhat-detailed plans outlining how they plan on using the money. Since the new program will aim to get funds into the hands of small business owners, the banks’ plans will need to detail how they will play a part in this.

              After a number of meetings with community banks that will be scheduled through the end of the year, officials hope to determine the amount of capital that will be distributed. The funds are only to be available to small institutions with less than $1 billion in assets. 

              In his announcement in Washington on Wednesday, President Obama said he was prepared to “shift the government bailout efforts from larger banks to smaller banks because small business owners still have too little access to credit.”[2] Officials behind the new program hope that increasing credit to smaller institutions will energize job growth, which is something that has been reported on relentlessly, but has received little government attention.

              Although the exact amount of the remainder of the stimulus funds is unknown, federal officials agree it is enough to support this new initiative. Having the funds already available and not having to wait on them to be raised will help get the program off the ground. The life of many small businesses could depend on the government’s ability to act quickly. Taking months to consult community bankers may delay the program and inhibit small businesses from acquiring much-needed capital. Small businesses have been ignored thus far and, through innovation and flexibility, they have been able to survive.

Thomas J. Powell

---

[1] See http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091020-709265.html

[2] See http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSWAT01385420091021

 

The discussion of investment strategies in this article should not be considered an offer to buy or sell any investment. As always, consult an investment professional to assist you in meeting your investment goals. 

Isn’t It Ironic? Bailed-Out Banks Pulling in Huge Profits While Business Struggles

It has been very interesting the past several days in the stock market.  The Dow pushed over 10,000 last week and sits at nearly 10,100 today.  The weak dollar can share part of the claim reaching this important mark, but another, more interesting part are the reports by some of the country’s largest banks of very solid earnings for the past quarter.

JPMorgan reported a profit between July and September of $3.59 billion.  Goldman Sachs earned $3.19 billion during the same time period, reporting the most it has ever made in three months, with each of the bank’s employees earning an average of $700,000 EACH.  Citigroup has reported a profit of $101 million; we’ve gotten so used to the “B” word, millions seem like chump change.

I am happy to know that some companies out there are actually making a profit and helping to create some positive news out there in the market place.  However, it strikes me as completely ironic that most of these institutions are the same organizations which 1) Helped create the economic mess in which we find ourselves; 2) Were bailed out by the taxpayers, meaning the 51% and mainly the top 5% of our population which pay the majority of taxes; and 3)Have stopped the flow of capital into the market, cutting off businesses from their credit and capital lifelines, all the while paying their people unbelievable amounts of money.

Don’t get me wrong.  I am all about capitalism, free enterprise and  entrepreneurship.  Those who make it on their own and with their own drive and tenacity deserve every dollar and every success they can collect.  What I am absolutely opposed to is the organization which has an open check and safety net from the government, hoards its money by investing in T-bills, stops the flow of capital and the monetary cycle to the market, all the while rewarding itself in the process.

No matter what positive signs the media is portraying, the every day reality is that business is hurting.  My circle of friends consists of nearly all business owners; not one of them I know is looking to hire anyone soon, and may still have more downsizing to go.  Nearly all of them need capital, and nearly all of them cannot find it, leaving them with dwindling options to keep their doors open.

I look forward to the flow of capital back into the market.  Until then, it’s going to be up to us as individuals to keep projects and businesses moving forward.  If you see a project or have a business you like, consider investing in those entities in addition to traditional investments.  I can assure you the gratitude from the business or project owner will far surpass that of a stock certificate, not to mention the potential returns may be very rewarding.

All my best,

Thomas J Powell

 

Reno’s ELP Capital Seeks OK for Investment Vehicles

BY JOHN SEELMEYER

ELP Capital Inc. of Reno seeks regulatory

approval for two investment funds that will

target well-heeled sophisticated individual

investors.

Thomas Powell, the chief executive officer

of ELP Capital Inc., says the funds mark an

effort to jump-start the northern Nevada economy

by channeling local investment dollars

into local projects.

The company last week filed a notice with

the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

that it believes the two funds are exempt from

securities regulations because they will be sold

to a limited number of investors or to buyers

who meet the SEC’s standards for accredited

investors. (Those standards include net worth

and annual income for individual investors.)

The ELP Strategic Asset Fund LLC has

raised $450,000 so far, the company said in an

SEC filing. There’s no maximum size on the

fund, and minimum investments are set at

$250,000.

A second fund, ELP Opportunity Fund 1—

GBLL LLC, is planned to raised $2.3 million.

So far, $100,000 has been raised.Minimum

investment in the fund is $50,000.

ELP Capital, incorporated in 2004, has

managed debt and equity financing of real

estate. The company traces its beginnings to

IntoHomes LLC, a residential mortgage lender

launched by Powell in 1999.

Along with Powell, its board includes Jesse

Haw, president of Hawco Properties of Spanish

Springs, and Bob Barone, chairman of Ancora

West Trust Co. in Reno.

Powell, who’s also an author of books and

articles, has argued recently that private

investors can play a major role in getting the

construction and development markets moving

again if they’ll fund stalled quality projects.

“This recession … left a stockpile of quality

real-estate projects to collect dust.Without

proper funding, the projects remain undeveloped,

unproductive and severely underemployed.

Placing our private capital into quality

projects will bolster the number of available

jobs in our communities and get people

behind a meaningful cause,” he wrote in an

essay this month.

ELP Capital expects to charge an annual

management fee of 1 percent of the funds’

assets, and it also may collect a performance

fee.

Along with the two investment funds, ELP

Capital last week filed SEC paperwork for

exempt offerings of securities in two real estate

funds.

One of the filings covers ELP Mortgage

Fund III — The Ridges LLC. The company

said $2.1 million of the $2.5 million fund has

been sold to accredited investors.

The second filing covered ELP Acquisition

Fund—Citi Centre LLC, which has raised

about $3.28 million of a $4.5 million offering.

Cambridge AMDP Newsletter

Check out my recent entry in the AMDP Alumni Newsletter.
Cambridge AMD Alumni Newsletter

Best Wishes,

Thomas J. Powell

Housing: “The Worst is Over” A Numbers Game

Many are touting “the worst is over” for the housing market, but I’m not ready to agree. We had some good news today. Housing starts are up, slightly, and prices are up a hair. In order to understand what’s really going on though, we have to take a look beyond numbers. There are a few good reasons for stabilization in the housing markets- low interest rates, good deals and the first-time homebuyer credit. Notice anything in common? None of these are permanent factors. Low interest rates have created an incentive to refinance as much to purchase new homes. As the Washington Business Journal states, two-thirds of new loans have been from refinancing. Once the glut of foreclosures has been gobbled up, there is little room for increased sales from cheap housing. Don’t get me wrong, this may be a good thing, point is, it won’t last forever. And finally, the tax credit for new homebuyers is set to expire in November, right around the time housing traditionally slows down.

Looking forward, I see the real possibility of another decline. The Deutsche Bank agrees. They expect a 10 percent correction in the US market. To make things worse, mortgage delinquencies are on the rise. Credit default is up across the board and as unemployment continues to rise, default will increase. As I mentioned before, unemployment will lag for a long time, even if the rest of the economy is humming. So don’t count on significant gains anytime soon.

If it seems like I’m preaching doomsday here, I’m not. I’m just hesitant to buy the administration’s optimism. Yes, Bernanke’s emergency loan facilities stabilized the system. Congress’ schemes have reaped small rewards. But these are emergency measures, not long-term fixes. They, like me, are waiting for the private markets to start flowing again.

Recession and Recovery- Mixed Signals

Today’s news from the Fed has been optimistic. Bernanke says the recession might be over, but what does that mean for us? In technical terms, a recession is two consecutive quarters of zero growth. It looks like we are beating that trend. So what? Cheer the administration, forget about the troubled financial industry and move on right? Wrong. Krugman points out that, although the recession is technically ending, we’re not out of the woods yet. Unemployment, as expected, will remain high for years to come. Compared to where we were two years ago, the US faces an enormous output gap, something around a trillion dollars a year. According to Condgon from the IMF, the broader monetary base has been shrinking. The Fed’s insistence on boosting capital ratio’s may be back firing here: if banks are required to increase capital ratio’s there is less to lend, and subsequently a decreased capacity to grow. Despite decent news from Bernanke, a shrinking money supply points to deflation. Instead of recovery, we may be looking at a double-dip recession. That’s when we start to recover, only to fall flat again.
How do we avoid another, possibly deeper recession? Krugman argues for more stimulus. Condgon expects monetary easing. I must reiterate my core values here. The recovery will come when smaller firms have adequate access to capital. Private capital will pull us out, not more stimulus. Quantitative easing has brought us to near-zero interest rates with no affect on output. How exactly is monetary policy going to work if money continues to contract? As for fiscal stimulus, wouldn’t that bring us back to where we are now, a slow recovery with continued high unemployment?
Let’s get away from big government bail-out schemes and let capitalism do its job. In today’s WSJ, Cochrane and Zingales argue against the too-big-to-fail doctrine. If banks don’t fail, bankers have no incentive to react to risk. It’s called moral hazard- tails I win, heads you loose. The too-big-to fail doctrine flies in the face of a hundred years of economic theory. One of capitalism’s grand fathers, Joseph Schumpeter, argued for “creative destruction,” a process that enables the most efficient distribution of capital. If banks cannot fail, the industry cannot correct itself. The system has forgotten Schumpeter. It no longer rewards the most productive enterprises. Instead, the government has transferred trillions of dollars to failed enterprises. The result isn’t capitalism, but some corrupt form of corporate banditry.

All my best,

Thomas J Powell

Too Big to Fail? Here We Go Again…

Today marks the one year anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers, one of the worst financial disasters of our time, as it nearly brought down the international financial system. Yesterday I was reading an article about how the big banks are showing signs of life with their actions and things are starting to move, signalling a possible economic recovery. This makes me wonder about the adage of being “too big to fail.” What is the right decision in this situation?

It appears to me that after the latest cycle, quite possibly and hopefully the worst we will see in our lifetimes, people are hoping that this time things will be different. That once we actually do reach a point of recovery, we won’t make the same mistakes that were recently experienced. This cycle has been painful; it has been gut-wrenching; it has been a lesson I surely don’t want to repeat, as I get it and don’t need to learn it again.

I am very nervous about this thought process. As the saying goes, history repeats itself, and that did not become a quote we all use without good reason. For generations, for decades, for centuries, the animal in human nature causes us to make the same decisions and choose the same paths as before.

Some of our largest banks, which the government determined were too big to fail, received billions in taxpayer TARP funds. Our money kept these institutions afloat and I understand the reasoning behind keeping their doors open, especially using the Lehman example. I am dismayed, however, at the actions of these institutions. By receiving government funds, they are able to continually take on high degrees of risk, knowing there is a safety net underneath them. Prudent due diligence has gone by the wayside with the knowledge of someone is there to catch them. I liken this to the casino industry. If you could borrow $1 Million dollars and gamble it, knowing you would get it back if you lost it PLUS knowing you would get to keep any winnings you made, why wouldn’t you do it? This is exactly the system we have allowed to be established.

And, what about the outrageous salaries and bonus payments we still continue to hear about? I am all for the entrepreneur earning as much as he or she can based on value and return to society, but I am not about taking from you and me, putting a chokehold on getting capital back into circulation while cutting off small business, and then handsomely rewarding the big bank players in the process.

The veritas, the truth, as I see it, is that nothing has really changed, that we are repeating ourselves and that we will all pay the price of the failure to learn what could be a valuable and useful lesson. As we continue through this cycle, which I believe still has more pain to come, I hope for and have faith in the success of the small business, for the will of the entrepreneur, and for the recovery of our great land.

Too big to fail? Ok, I’ll give the government that. But what about keeping the backbone of American capitalism healthy? I’m not saying the answer is in government bailouts for small business, as anyone who knows me knows I believe in complete personal responsibility. I’m only asking for the same access to capital for small business so that it can keep its doors open, giving it time to make the changes and adjustments necessary for its own success. In short, allowing business to help itself.

I have thoughts on how I believe this can be done without the banks, allowing history to repeat itself in the manner I believe will lead to our recovery. I will write more in the coming days, but in short I believe in private capital + private enterprise = economic recovery.

I look forward to sharing more of my thoughts and receiving your feedback.

All my best,

Thomas J Powell

Taking Control of the Things We Can

Earlier this week, after wrestling with the spate of painful economic news provided by major media, I recognized that I had no immediate control over any of the massive economic concerns. The stock market zigged when I hoped it would zag. Unemployment numbers, often reported differently, moved at different paces in the undesirable direction. Our federal deficit grew, which increased our individual debt responsibility. The problems were not confined by the pages of the newspapers. When I peered through my office window I saw quality real-estate projects continuing to sit lifeless because they lacked funding. After a few moments of reflection, I recognized that I, and certainly the majority of us, am being forcibly weighed down by all of the negative. Instead of dwelling on the uncontrollable, we should be manifesting the positive by taking hold of the reins on those things in which we can have significant influence.
I decided to start anew with more refreshing thoughts. So, I turned to a medium in which I had some control over the information that was presented to me: Google. Two main pages topped the list when I searched for the words “Economy: We Are the Answer.” The first was an informal Yahoo Answer Board on which the following question was raised: “Is there hope for the American economy or should we just drastically change the way we live?” The user went on to define “drastically change” by giving up our private houses and cars. The second most-popular page that appeared was BarackObama.com, which suggests no one within Google’s reach really believes we the people have the capacity to be the answer to our economic problems. According to my Google search, the answer either rests in the hands of President Obama or we will all be forced to live in communal frat houses without automobiles.
When our economy is running smoothly, we all welcome the opportunities to be part of a do-it-yourself world. We bag our own groceries, scan our own documents, rent our own movies and print our own boarding passes. On a weekly basis, we all most likely take it upon ourselves to deposit, track, clean, swipe, dry, spray, refill, bus, organize, pour, dispense and scan in the presence of other do-it-yourselfers in the vast public. As long as the tasks are minimal and the goal is clearly in view, we are encouraged to do everything ourselves. The responsibilities we used to let others handle, we now do ourselves (I cooked my own meal at Melting Pot earlier in the month). About half of the times I visit a gas station, there is no reason for an attendant to be present—unless I am in Oregon or New Jersey, where state officials prohibit me from pumping my own gas. But, when an issue has options that are more complex than selecting diesel or regular, our individual accountability takes a vacation. Why do we turn our focus to other superpowers to take control and eliminate ourselves from the equation?
The Problem is Passivity
This economic downturn is nothing more than a collection of intertwined problems. Although financially painful and physically overwhelming, there is no reason for any of us to hide underneath our desks and wait for the shaking to end. Think about the steps we all take when trying to overcome a timely problem—for an example, a clogged drain. We take a short period of time to analyze the situation. We look at all the factors involved and ask ourselves crucial questions: Is the water draining at all? Is the clog causing the pipes to leak? How severe is the leak? Is it causing immediate damage? Next, inevitably, it is human instinct to search for the quickest fix. We switch on the garbage disposal and rub our lucky rabbit’s foot. When we are forced to take real action we must recognize the weapons we have to combat the problem (a plunger, a drain snake, Drain-O). After we extinguish our resources, we then consult the knowledge of an expert.
Now consider the enormity of our current economic struggles. The formula for dealing with the problem is much more complex, but it should still follow the basic fundamentals. Why then have droves of investors been complacent to listen to long-winded “experts” before analyzing their situation and deducing what it is that they can do for themselves? The formula is flip-flopped when we let ourselves believe that any given problem is too big or too complex. Remember the old adage, “We can only eat an elephant one bite at a time”? Many of the intricacies of this recession are out of our control, but the sooner we take control over the issues we can influence, the sooner the complex problems begin to untangle.
If the severity of the problem is directly proportionate to the amount of time we take to analyze it, then we only need a brief moment to stare into a clogged drain. In that same vein, our economic crisis is much more complex and has required a longer period for analysis. I argue we have passed this stage of the process and action is required now. This summer brought about a number of signs that suggest we are now slogging around somewhere near the bottom. With home-improvement projects, summer vacations and outdoor entertainment, consumers typically spend more in the summer months. We are now entering what is destined to be a difficult autumn. Unemployment will continue to strain on families, foreclosures will mount and consumers will tighten the belts they let momentarily loosen over the summer.
On the other hand, as the leaves turn and nature gets stripped of its color, a buckled economy will continue to present opportunities for us to take action. It is time for all of us to stop viewing ourselves as helpless observers and again consider ourselves part of the equation. In some ways we already are important variables, but we rely on the inadvertent action we take to be sufficient. How many times have you heard an angry citizen blurt out something along the lines of “I do my part, I’m a taxpayer”? The somewhat-passive action of paying taxes funds many integral economic systems in which our country balances itself. Just as we hire plumbers to help unclog our drains and keep them running smoothly we elect (read “hire”) officials to help unclog our economy and keep it running smoothly. With our plumbers, we are responsible for paying the bill to enable them to do their job. The same is true for the officials; by paying our taxes, we essentially all pick up our share of the bill and expect them to do their share of the work. Without our capital, their positions would not exist; but this hardly means we have positioned ourselves as active parts of the recovery.
Investing to Make a Difference
To be an important cog in the recovery machine, we must put our money to work. Our money does not do any good stuffed in a mattress or buried underneath the deck. Private capital built this country and there are few economic problems that private capital cannot solve, if allocated effectively. During the Great Depression, a time when the economy constricted and the majority of construction projects were put on hold, the entire construction of the Empire State Building was completed. Thanks to funding from its principle backer, an automobile tycoon aiming to one-up a major competitor, the Empire State Building was constructed with staggering momentum. During the Depression, building materials were cheaper and workers were eager to earn a wage, much like today. The construction put people and money back to work in dire times; not to mention the mystique the building has given our country for nearly eight decades.
A project as grand as the Empire State Building might only come around once a century, but that does not rule out the need for quality projects in our own communities. When private capital teams with quality-managed projects, the outcomes can be extraordinary. But, you need both. Whereas quality projects cannot get off the ground without capital, poorly-managed projects get ran back into the ground even with all the capital in the world.
This recession has torn through our communities and left a stockpile of quality real-estate projects to collect dust. Without proper funding, the projects remain undeveloped, unproductive and severely underemployed. Placing our private capital into quality projects will bolster the number of available jobs in our communities and get people behind a meaningful cause. There are loads of individuals that could be taking charge and becoming part of this recovery. We will show great resilience when we, on our own, come out of this strong, super-charged and feeling part of something.
We have to put the days of excuses behind us. We should be searching for any project that someone says “can’t be done” and aim to defy. When the newspapers have stopped reporting stories that highlight economic blemishes, our unemployment numbers are approaching all-time lows and our government takes a permanent vacation from bailouts; we will only vaguely remember our current doubts. We will, however, remember the period of time when we all did our part to restore communities. We will remember the turning point when we took action to pull ourselves from the painful times and regained our spot as part of the equation.

Treasury Signals Pull Out, Good News for Entreprenuers

In a recent USA Today post, Rhonda Abrams compared entrepreneurship to whitewater rafting.  My favorite tip is number six, “keep paddling…you’ve got to navigate your way through tough challenges.”  In a recession like this one, you must navigate your own course.  We cannot rely on the government to get us out of this mess

Policy makers are beginning to signal the same sentiment. The Treasury Department announced today that it would be scaling back government intervention in the financial markets. They’re sending an important message- mainly, the bail-out will not last forever- just long enough to stabilize lending so the markets can take over.

Though Treasury warns of continued lack-luster performance in the short-term, today’s news isn’t all bad.  Oil production is to remain constant and trade data shows growth in both imports and exports as demand increases on international stimulus spending.  Remember, the stimulus spending is a temporary fix.  The real rebound will come from the private sector, the entrepreneur. 

So I agree with Abrams, make your own plan, get the advice you need, and hold on in troubled times.